The Influence Journal

The Hidden Cost of High Performers: When Top Talent Turns Toxic

When high performers poison your culture, results aren’t enough. Learn how to spot toxic top talent, protect your team, and lead with courage.

They’re your highest achiever. Your most visible success story.
But behind the scenes, they’re draining morale, alienating teammates, and eroding trust one meeting at a time.

Welcome to one of the most dangerous dynamics in leadership:
The toxic high performer.

These are the team members who produce undeniable results while quietly poisoning your culture. And unless you act early, they can do more damage than any underperformer ever could.

This article is your guide to spotting the red flags, navigating the politics, and making the hard leadership decisions that protect your team’s long-term health—before it’s too late.


Why Top Performers Get a Free Pass

Let’s be honest: performance buys power.

When someone hits every metric, brings in big deals, or delivers faster than anyone else, they earn the benefit of the doubt—often more benefit than they should.

It’s tempting to say:

“They’re a bit abrasive, but that’s just their style.”
“We can’t afford to lose them right now.”
“Let’s wait until things calm down before addressing it.”

And just like that, their behavior becomes untouchable.

This creates a dangerous precedent:
High output becomes a shield for low character.

But culture doesn’t care how much someone produces. It responds to how people make others feel. And the longer toxic behavior is tolerated, the more it spreads.


The 5 Signs Your Top Performer Is Poisoning the Culture

Not all high performers are toxic.
But toxic high performers almost always show the same patterns:


1. They Undermine Others Privately

They dominate in meetings but whisper criticisms behind closed doors.
They sow subtle doubt: “I’m not sure she’s ready for that project” or “He’s just not thinking strategically.”

This isn’t feedback—it’s sabotage disguised as concern.


2. They Hoard Credit and Withhold Information

They present team wins as their own.
They leave teammates out of key conversations or hoard context to stay indispensable.

If your team starts saying, “I had no idea that decision was made,” you have a trust problem.


3. They Manage Up and Bully Down

They charm executives but intimidate peers and subordinates.
Their behavior changes based on who’s in the room.

Psychological safety plummets—but leaders often don’t see it until it’s too late.


4. They Weaponize ‘Urgency’

Every request is urgent. Every mistake is someone else’s fault.
They create constant stress to maintain power.

Over time, their team burns out while they shine.


5. They Use Performance as a Shield

When confronted, they deflect: “Look at my numbers.”
They act like results excuse behavior.

This is manipulation—high-functioning, well-dressed manipulation.


What You’re Really Teaching Your Team

Every time you ignore a toxic high performer, you’re sending a message:
Results matter more than people.

And your team hears it.

  • They stop speaking up.
  • They stop trusting leadership.
  • They stop trying—because the rules clearly don’t apply to everyone.

The best people leave quietly. The worst people adapt the same tactics.
You don’t just lose one toxic person—you inherit a culture of fear.


Case Study: The Star Who Wrecked the Room

One company I consulted had a sales director—let’s call him “Alex”—who outperformed every rep on the floor. Quarter after quarter, his numbers led the board.

But under the surface?

  • He belittled junior reps in Slack threads.
  • He demanded weekend work without approval.
  • He took client leads meant for teammates.
  • He shot down ideas from others out of self-interest

Turnover in his region was the highest in the company. But leadership hesitated.

“We can’t lose Alex. He’s half our revenue.”

Six months later, three senior team members resigned in one week.
When leadership finally let Alex go, client trust was shaken, morale was low, and rebuilding took nearly a year.

Alex wasn’t irreplaceable.
But the damage he caused? Nearly irreversible.


Why This Keeps Happening

Three reasons:

  1. We mistake results for character.
    Great performance doesn’t mean someone has great judgment, self-awareness, or integrity.
  2. We fear short-term loss more than long-term risk.
    It’s easier to delay a tough decision than deal with disruption.
  3. We reward ‘heroic effort’ over healthy systems.
    High performers often thrive in chaos—because they create it.

So What Should You Do?

It takes courage to confront a toxic high performer.
But it’s not just brave—it’s smart.

Here’s how:


1. Document Behavior, Not Just Feelings

Don’t rely on vague impressions like “They’re a jerk.”
Track patterns:

  • Dates of conflicts
  • Specific comments or actions
  • Impact on team performance

Facts protect you—and your team.


2. Use the ‘Triple Lens’ Performance Review

When evaluating top performers, look at:

  • Results (metrics, revenue, output)
  • Relationships (team feedback, collaboration, morale)
  • Reputation (how others experience their leadership)

If one lens is cracked, the picture isn’t complete.


3. Have the Hard Conversation

Speak clearly. Use direct examples. Avoid fluff.

“You’re hitting your targets, but your leadership style is damaging trust. That’s not sustainable here.”

Let them know:
Performance is the floor, not the ceiling.
How they treat people matters just as much as what they deliver.


4. Give a Path—but Set a Deadline

Offer a chance to change—with structure:

  • Coaching or mentoring
  • 360-degree feedback
  • Regular check-ins

But set a timeline. Toxic behavior doesn’t get unlimited grace.


5. Don’t Wait to Protect Your Culture

If they won’t change—cut ties.

Letting go of a toxic high performer might feel like a loss.
But here’s what you gain:

  • Psychological safety
  • Team alignment
  • Loyalty from those who stay
  • A reputation for values-driven leadership

And often?
Performance actually improves—because the fear fog lifts.


Tools to Help You Move Forward

Here are practical resources to strengthen your leadership muscle around this issue:


Final Word: Don’t Confuse Influence With Impact

It’s easy to mistake loud success for leadership.
But true leadership is quiet, consistent, and trustworthy.

The most important thing you protect as a leader isn’t performance.
It’s people.

So next time you’re tempted to let a top performer slide because they’re “just too valuable,” ask this:

What’s the cost of keeping them—if everyone else starts leaving?


Let’s Build Better Cultures

The Influence Journal is where we explore the psychology of leadership, trust, and organizational culture.
If you care about becoming a leader people want to follow, not just obey—this is your place.

Related Reading from The Influence Journal:

What Is Emotional Safety at Work? (And Why Great Leaders Prioritize It)

Leadership Gaslighting: How Good Leaders Accidentally Undermine Trust

The Leader Who Talks Too Much: Why Over-Explaining Kills Trust

The Psychology of Trust: Why People Follow Some Leaders and Not Others in 2025

The Psychology of Toxic Leadership: How Good Cultures Get Poisoned


Discover more from The Influence Journal | Leadership, Trust, and the Psychology of Culture

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

5 responses to “The Hidden Cost of High Performers: When Top Talent Turns Toxic”

  1. Raffaello Palandri Avatar

    Now … as an exceptionally gifted individual with AuDHD and yes, a high performer, this post resonates deeply, and not without a measure of pain.

    Once again, the subtext appears to suggest that we must prioritize the comfort and cohesion of the statistical majority, rather than embracing and integrating the outliers—those at the extremes of the Gaussian curve.

    In most professional contexts, I effortlessly exceed the performance of peers—not out of arrogance, but as an empirical observation of cognitive velocity, integrative thinking, and multidimensional problem-solving. And yet, this very excellence is frequently perceived not as a collective asset, but as a threat to team morale. It is as if the presence of a mind that persistently outpaces the norm is inherently destabilizing rather than strategically advantageous.

    This compels me to pose a deliberately provocative question: Shouldn’t effective leadership involve cultivating a framework that honors and includes high-performers—those who think and operate beyond convention—rather than diluting their contributions for the sake of uniformity? Why is the dominant model one of protecting conformity rather than integrating brilliance?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Jeremy Avatar

      Thank you so much, Raffeollo, for this powerful and vulnerable reflection—it adds meaningful depth to the conversation.

      You’re absolutely right to raise this tension. There is a critical difference between toxic behavior and exceptional cognition, and I should have drawn that line more clearly.

      This article is definitely not an indictment of brilliance, neurodivergence, or intensity. In fact, some of the most impactful leaders I’ve worked with were outliers—people who thought faster, saw more, and pushed harder than anyone else. Their challenge wasn’t that they were “too much.” It was that their environments were too small.

      The problem I’m addressing is different: when performance becomes a shield for harm. When someone consistently undermines trust, erodes safety, or elevates themselves at the expense of others—regardless of output—that’s where leadership must step in.

      But the real invitation you’ve surfaced is this:
      How can we lead in a way that integrates brilliance instead of fearing it?

      That’s a question worth building an entire framework around—and I’m genuinely grateful you asked it.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Raffaello Palandri Avatar

    And I will be extremely happy to read about it!

    Thank you for your kind words.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. The Psychology of Toxic Leadership: How Good Cultures Get Poisoned – The Influence Journal | Leadership, Trust, and the Psychology of Culture Avatar

    […] makes it so pernicious is that toxic leaders often start as high-performers—visionaries with charisma, confidence, or a knack for results. But when certain psychological […]

    Like

  4. Culture Isn’t Caught—It’s Trained: Why Every Great Organization Teaches Its People How to Think, Not Just What to Do – The Influence Journal | Leadership, Trust, and the Psychology of Culture Avatar

    […] If the most aggressive person in the room always gets their way, your culture will become competitive. If no one ever disagrees publicly with leadership, your culture will become silent. If the only thing celebrated is quarterly performance, your culture will become transactional. And if someone asks, “Is this how we do things here?” the answer they’ll get won’t be a clear explanation of values. It’ll be a shrug. […]

    Like

Leave a comment