The Influence Journal

Performative Leadership Is Undermining Your Team

How to Spot It—and What Real Leadership Requires

Performative leadership is killing trust in your workplace. Learn how to spot it, why it’s so common, and how real leaders rebuild credibility through clarity, consistency, and presence.


“Leadership is not about being in charge. It’s about taking care of those in your charge.”
—Simon Sinek

Leadership today has never been more visible—and never more hollow.

Scroll through LinkedIn. Tune in to a town hall. Read a CEO newsletter. You’ll hear the language of modern leadership everywhere: alignment, authenticity, psychological safety, empathy, trust. The words are polished, the values aspirational, and the tone reassuring.

But behind closed doors, in meeting rooms and Slack threads, many teams tell a different story. They feel unclear. Unheard. Disconnected. And increasingly, they’re not just burned out—they’re disillusioned.

Why? Because they don’t experience real leadership. They experience a version of it—one that looks like leadership, sounds like leadership, but doesn’t lead.

What they’re experiencing is performative leadership.

This isn’t just a cultural annoyance or aesthetic concern. It’s a systems issue. It’s the erosion of integrity at the very core of how influence works. And if left unaddressed, it slowly rots the foundation of any team—no matter how talented, well-funded, or high-functioning they seem on the surface.


What Is Performative Leadership?

Performative leadership is the act of playing the role of a leader without embodying the responsibility of one.

It emphasizes style over substance, presence over participation, and polish over practice. It’s leadership by optics—often fluent in the language of values, yet detached from the weight of living them out.

Importantly, this isn’t usually malicious. Performative leaders don’t walk into the role intending to mislead or manipulate. Most are well-meaning. They attend the meetings. They hit the talking points. They say the right things. But their teams don’t feel led. They feel managed. They feel messaged. Sometimes, they feel completely unseen.

In psychological terms, this mirrors a concept known as impression management—a behavioral pattern where individuals curate how they’re perceived, often without addressing the underlying behaviors that shape actual outcomes. When impression management becomes a leadership operating system, optics become currency, and authenticity becomes theater.


The Day I Realized I Was Leading from a Script

My first real leadership role came with a title, a team, and a weekly one-on-one with a supervisor I respected. I had spent years studying leadership—books, podcasts, vision decks, values statements. I knew how to talk leadership. But when I stepped into the role, I didn’t actually lead.

I performed.

Every week before our one-on-one, I’d worry about whether my agenda items were “leaderly” enough. Was I bringing the right metrics? Was I asking the right strategic questions? I wasn’t thinking about what the team actually needed—I was thinking about how I’d be perceived. Would I sound thoughtful? Would I look composed? Would I come across as someone with executive presence?

When I taught, I obsessed over how I looked and sounded. I spent more time rehearsing phrasing than planning structure. If someone asked a challenging question, I defaulted to eloquence instead of clarity—hoping that if I sounded smart enough, no one would notice I didn’t have a concrete answer. I talked about transparency in all the right ways. But I rarely shared uncertainty. I said feedback mattered, but I didn’t invite it—especially not the kind that might bruise my carefully managed image.

I wasn’t trying to manipulate anyone. But I had learned that leadership looked a certain way—confident, clear, articulate—and I worked hard to play that part.

And then a close friend and colleague said something I’ll never forget:

“I like it when I’m talking with you. I want to hear your voice. I feel like when you’re teaching, I’m hearing a performance version of you.”

That hit like a punch to the gut. Because I knew he was right. I had been performing leadership, not practicing it. I cared more about being seen as competent than creating a space where others could thrive.

That moment didn’t just humble me—it rewired me. I started leading meetings with fewer answers and more questions. I stopped rehearsing what I’d say in my check-ins and started showing up to actually listen. I stopped quoting values and started living them—especially when it was costly.

Leadership isn’t theater. It’s not how you look when you talk. It’s who you become when you show up for people.


What Performative Leadership Looks Like

If you’re wondering whether performative leadership is at play in your organization—or in yourself—start here. These are the most common signs, not drawn from theory but from lived reality across dozens of teams:

1. Language Without Follow-Through

You’ll hear commitments to “transparency,” “empowerment,” or “mental health support”—but day-to-day behaviors stay the same. The values are beautifully framed in keynote slides and internal emails. But execution? Minimal.

2. A Focus on Optics Over Outcomes

More attention is given to how something will be perceived than how it will be experienced. There’s a slide for everything, a script for every appearance—but team morale continues to deteriorate.

3. Emotional Distance Framed as Professionalism

Leaders project stoicism as a strength. They remain calm and composed—but emotionally unavailable. Vulnerability is filtered through performance. There’s no real connection—just carefully managed impressions.

4. Scripted Vulnerability

When leaders do share personal stories or struggles, they feel rehearsed. Safe. Pre-packaged. They check the box on “authenticity” without ever touching real risk.

5. Lots of Communication, Little Clarity

Meetings are full of abstract language about vision and mission. But employees walk away unclear on next steps. The strategy is elegant in theory—and confusing in practice.

6. Feedback Avoidance

Performative leaders often talk down the ladder, rarely across or up. Feedback is welcomed in theory, but not in structure. And when it’s offered, it’s rarely acted upon.


Why This Kind of Leadership Is Everywhere Right Now

It’s not just individual personalities. There are deeper forces shaping this shift toward image over substance:

1. The Social Media Effect

Leadership is now public. Executives are expected to be thought leaders, brand ambassadors, and communicators. That pressure creates a constant incentive to look aligned—even when the internal experience doesn’t match.

2. Corporate Culture Rewards Optics

Perception management is often more valuable than people management in promotion pipelines. Leaders who present well—even if they lead poorly—are often seen as “ready” for advancement.

3. Busyness as a Status Symbol

Constant meetings, updates, and Slack visibility get mistaken for effectiveness. But activity is not the same as influence. You can be fully booked and still leave your team unanchored.

4. Leadership Training Is Style-Heavy

Most development programs teach communication and presence. Few teach courage, clarity, or the art of leading when trust is low. The result? Leaders who can deliver a TED Talk—but can’t lead a conflict-resolution conversation.

5. Feedback Channels Are Broken

If employees don’t feel safe giving upward feedback, leaders become insulated. They assume silence means alignment, when it often signals fear, fatigue, or disengagement.


What Real Leadership Requires Instead

You don’t fix performative leadership by stripping away polish. You fix it by restoring the connection between what leaders say and what they actually do.

Here’s what that looks like in practice:

1. Own the Gap

If there’s a misalignment between your stated values and your daily actions—say so. Integrity starts where performance ends. People trust leaders who confess before they’re caught.

2. Ask for Feedback in Specific, Safe Ways

Don’t ask, “Any feedback for me?” Ask, “Where do you see a gap between what I say and how I lead?” Make it about alignment, not affirmation.

3. Be Present, Not Just Visible

Presence isn’t just about being in meetings. It’s about being emotionally available, relationally honest, and curious enough to listen. Good leadership starts with staying grounded in the reality of your people.

4. Let Action Replace Rhetoric

Don’t launch a new culture statement. Make a decision that reflects your stated values. Shift a meeting. Move a budget line. Change a policy. Do something before you announce something.

5. Build a Leadership Rhythm That Reinforces Trust

Trust isn’t rebuilt in a keynote. It’s rebuilt in habits: regular check-ins, transparent decisions, follow-up after hard conversations, and a feedback loop that actually loops. Consistency builds credibility.


Final Thought: Leadership Is Trust, Not Theater

The best leaders aren’t always the most polished. They aren’t always the most articulate. But they are grounded. They are present. And their teams feel the difference.

Because performative leadership wins applause—but real leadership builds trust.

And trust, over time, is what builds teams that last.


✅ Want More Articles Like This?

Subscribe to The Influence Journal to receive longform leadership essays—no gimmicks, no filler, just insight that actually helps you lead better.


Discover more from The Influence Journal | Leadership, Trust, and the Psychology of Culture

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

One response to “Performative Leadership Is Undermining Your Team”

  1. Decision-Making Models for Effective Leadership – The Influence Journal | Leadership, Trust, and the Psychology of Culture Avatar

    […] People can accept a decision they don’t fully agree with—if they trust the process behind it.They will not rally behind a decision that feels mysterious, performative, or politically driven. […]

    Like

Leave a comment